At 12:34 PM 10/8/2001 -0700, Nate Campi wrote: >I think most of us just forward over stunnel with TCP logging and don't >reallly worry about it. [ ... ] Sure, that works. But since it's listed as a "feature-to-be" and with other scenarios where stunnel might be overkill, this feature would be worthwhile to have. I presume it would have some form of digital signature (and verification) capability?