[syslog-ng] Encrypted messages

[todd glassey]

The real issue is in building a timestamping regimen and PKI based crypto
service so that the log can be claimed to be "non-repudiated" and can later
for forensic reasons be taken apart.

This is way more than just tunneling and BTW, if you need a reason why this
would be a good feature set to add,  are you folks aware that under GLB and
the privacy acts of a number of countries we all as systems admins can go to
jail over what our logs contain.

Todd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Forrest Aldrich" <forrie@navipath.com>
To: <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] Encrypted messages


> At 12:34 PM 10/8/2001 -0700, Nate Campi wrote:
>
> >I think most of us just forward over stunnel with TCP logging and don't
> >reallly worry about it.
> [ ... ]
>
> Sure, that works.   But since it's listed as a "feature-to-be" and with
> other scenarios where stunnel might be overkill, this feature would be
> worthwhile to have.   I presume it would have some form of digital
> signature (and verification) capability?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> syslog-ng maillist  -  syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu
> https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng