Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled?
Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases? Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge. On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote: Hi, Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE, Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file modification. Bye, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com> wrote:
We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
Thanks, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com> wrote:
hi,
well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2, so we can continue with this state.
_____________________________ From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler@balabit.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled? To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>
I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master branch. Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
@lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or reset the branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
-- Bazsi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
regards, Laszlo Budai
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <
wernli@in2p3.fr>
wrote:
Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking is that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this relies on unreleased features.Thanks!____________________________________________ __________________________________Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumenta tion: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product= syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/? product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
openssl 1.1 is for Fedora rawhide and Debian Unstable (or what it is called), so 3.9.1 is fine there. But a number of problems fixed were also reported for released distributions, and updates with configuration changes are not allowed there. Bye, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases? Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge.
On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
Hi,
Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE, Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file modification.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com> wrote:
We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
Thanks, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com> wrote:
hi,
well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2, so we can continue with this state.
_____________________________ From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler@balabit.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled? To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>
I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master branch. Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
@lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or reset the branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
-- Bazsi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai < laszlo.budai@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi,
I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
regards, Laszlo Budai
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <
wernli@in2p3.fr>
wrote:
Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking is that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this relies on unreleased features.Thanks!____________________________________________ __________________________________Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumenta tion: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product= syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/? product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
Hi, What the the key differences between 3.8 and 3.9 ? And which do people think is better ? On the website also the latest documentation shows 3.8 but if you look hard enough you will find 3.9 documentation Regards Simon
On 23 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Czanik, Péter <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
openssl 1.1 is for Fedora rawhide and Debian Unstable (or what it is called), so 3.9.1 is fine there. But a number of problems fixed were also reported for released distributions, and updates with configuration changes are not allowed there.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik@balabit.com>> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com <mailto:bazsi77@gmail.com>> wrote: Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases? Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge.
On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik@balabit.com>> wrote: Hi,
Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE, Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file modification.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik@balabit.com>> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com <mailto:bazsi77@gmail.com>> wrote: We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik@balabit.com>> wrote: Hi,
Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
Thanks, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik@balabit.com>> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com <mailto:laszlo.budai@outlook.com>> wrote:
hi,
well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2, so we can continue with this state.
_____________________________ From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler@balabit.com <mailto:balazs.scheidler@balabit.com>> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled? To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu <mailto:syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>>
I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master branch. Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
@lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or reset the branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
-- Bazsi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com <mailto:laszlo.budai@outlook.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
regards, Laszlo Budai
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <wernli@in2p3.fr <mailto:wernli@in2p3.fr>> wrote:
Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking is that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this relies on unreleased features.Thanks!______________________________________________________________________________Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumentation <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumentation>: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ>: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
Hi, There is no documentation available yet. You can see the list of new features and bugfixes in the release announcement on GitHub at https://github.com/balabit/syslog-ng/releases/tag/syslog-ng-3.9.1 Bye, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Simon Mousey Smith < simonsmith5521@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
What the the key differences between 3.8 and 3.9 ?
And which do people think is better ?
On the website also the latest documentation shows 3.8 but if you look hard enough you will find 3.9 documentation
Regards
Simon
On 23 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Czanik, Péter <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
openssl 1.1 is for Fedora rawhide and Debian Unstable (or what it is called), so 3.9.1 is fine there. But a number of problems fixed were also reported for released distributions, and updates with configuration changes are not allowed there.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases? Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge.
On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
Hi,
Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE, Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file modification.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77@gmail.com> wrote:
We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik@balabit.com> wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
Thanks, Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@balabit.com> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai@outlook.com> wrote:
hi,
well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2, so we can continue with this state.
_____________________________ From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler@balabit.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled? To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>
I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master branch. Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
@lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or reset the branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
-- Bazsi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai < laszlo.budai@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi,
I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
regards, Laszlo Budai
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <
wernli@in2p3.fr>
wrote:
> Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking is > that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this relies on > unreleased > features.Thanks!____________________________________________ __________________________________Member > info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumenta tion: > http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ: > http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support /documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product= syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/? product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
____________________________________________________________ __________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/? product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
participants (3)
-
Balazs Scheidler
-
Czanik, Péter
-
Simon Mousey Smith