[tproxy] Fwd: Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Nov 20 2007 15:16, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if the name 'tproxy' is the best, can you see any other
>> useful function of the table apart from tproxy?
>> 
>> a table-to-be-consulted-after-nat :) hmm 'mangle_afternat' or postnat,
>> or something?
>> 
>> I'm not against naming it tproxy, but the first reason to drop the
>> tproxy table was to avoid a tproxy specific table.
>
>That's a good point. Let's ask Patrick.
>
Ideally there is this supermassive plan of a number of people to
refactor iptables one way or the other so that you do not /have/
to create a tproxy table in the first place ;-)