[tproxy] The future of tproxy

Nicholas George nick.george at gmail.com
Fri May 25 10:45:22 CEST 2007

I was just reading the following post:


regarding TPROXY Version 4. ie NOT using iptables NAT, but being able
to bind to a non-local address.

The approach discussed in the post looks and sounds good. How close is
it to being ready for production use? Do you consider TPROXY Version 2
(the current TPROXY) safe for production use?

What are your future plans for TPROXY? I noticed that there's no plan
for NAT in ipv6tables, so are you looking to move away from a NAT
approach? Are you considering migrating towards Network Channels?

Kind Regards,
Nick George

More information about the tproxy mailing list