[syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled?

Fri Dec 23 08:34:55 UTC 2016

Hi,

What the the key differences between 3.8 and 3.9 ? 

And which do people think is better ?

On the website also the latest documentation shows 3.8 but if you look hard enough you will find 3.9 documentation

Regards

Simon
> On 23 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Czanik, Péter <peter.czanik at balabit.com> wrote:
> 
> openssl 1.1 is for Fedora rawhide and Debian Unstable (or what it is called), so 3.9.1 is fine there. But a number of problems fixed were also reported for released distributions, and updates with configuration changes are not allowed there.
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik at balabit.com>>
> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
> https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/>
> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77 at gmail.com <mailto:bazsi77 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases? Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge.
> 
> On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik at balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik at balabit.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE, Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file modification.
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik at balabit.com>>
> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
> https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/>
> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77 at gmail.com <mailto:bazsi77 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
> 
> On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik at balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik at balabit.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is
> not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com <mailto:peter.czanik at balabit.com>>
> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
> https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/ <https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/>
> https://twitter.com/PCzanik <https://twitter.com/PCzanik>
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai at outlook.com <mailto:laszlo.budai at outlook.com>> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2,
> > so we can continue with this state.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____________________________
> > From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler at balabit.com <mailto:balazs.scheidler at balabit.com>>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM
> > Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled?
> > To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list
> > <syslog-ng at lists.balabit.hu <mailto:syslog-ng at lists.balabit.hu>>
> >
> >
> > I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master branch.
> > Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
> >
> > @lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or reset the
> > branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
> >
> > --
> > Bazsi
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai at outlook.com <mailto:laszlo.budai at outlook.com>>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
> >>
> >> Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Laszlo Budai
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <wernli at in2p3.fr <mailto:wernli at in2p3.fr>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking is
> >>> that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this relies on
> >>> unreleased
> >>> features.Thanks!______________________________________________________________________________Member
> >>> info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumentation <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumentation>:
> >>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ>:
> >>> http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________________
> >> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> >> Documentation:
> >> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> >> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
> > Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> > Documentation:
> > http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> > FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng <https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng>
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng <http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng>
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq <http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq>
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/attachments/20161223/cab6ab27/attachment-0001.html>