[syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled?

[Czanik, Péter]

openssl 1.1 is for Fedora rawhide and Debian Unstable (or what it is
called), so 3.9.1 is fine there. But a number of problems fixed were also
reported for released distributions, and updates with configuration changes
are not allowed there.

Bye,

Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com>
Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/
https://twitter.com/PCzanik

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, you would want to backport 3.8.2 into existing distro releases?
> Because openssl 1.1 is I thought relevant to the bleeding edge.
>
> On Dec 23, 2016 08:06, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik at balabit.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Which is problematic in Linux distributions, where I have 3.8.1 (openSUSE,
> Fedora). There are tons of bugfixes, but while I can easily push 3.8.2 as
> an update, 3.9.1 is not an option as it also requires a config file
> modification.
>
> Bye,
>
> Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com>
> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
> https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/
> https://twitter.com/PCzanik
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi77 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We decided to skip 3.8.2 and go straight for 3.9.1.
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2016 08:19, "Czanik, Péter" <peter.czanik at balabit.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Looking at the 3.8/master branch I see, that openssl 1.1 support is
>>> not included. I'd need that for Fedora 26 support. Could you add it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at balabit.com>
>>> Balabit / syslog-ng upstream
>>> https://www.balabit.com/blog/author/peterczanik/
>>> https://twitter.com/PCzanik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Laszlo Budai <laszlo.budai at outlook.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > hi,
>>> >
>>> > well... searchguard could be part of 3.8.2,
>>> > so we can continue with this state.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _____________________________
>>> > From: Scheidler, Balázs <balazs.scheidler at balabit.com>
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:48 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] When is 3.8.2 scheduled?
>>> > To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list
>>> > <syslog-ng at lists.balabit.hu>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have just pushed a preliminary NEWS.md update on the 3.8/master
>>> branch.
>>> > Note that as it currently stands SearchGuard is part of 3.8/master.
>>> >
>>> > @lbudai: what do you think, shall we continue with this state, or
>>> reset the
>>> > branch to an earlier point and push these changes to 3.9 instead?
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Bazsi
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Laszlo Budai <
>>> laszlo.budai at outlook.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I think it won't be part of 3.8.2 , but 3.9.
>>> >>
>>> >> Our plan is to release both versions in this year.
>>> >>
>>> >> regards,
>>> >> Laszlo Budai
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM +0100, "Fabien Wernli" <
>>> wernli at in2p3.fr>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Dear list,Are there plans for a 3.8.2 release?The reason I'm asking
>>> is
>>> >>> that I'm writing a blog post on Searchguardintegration, and this
>>> relies on
>>> >>> unreleased
>>> >>> features.Thanks!____________________________________________
>>> __________________________________Member
>>> >>> info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ngDocumenta
>>> tion:
>>> >>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ngFAQ:
>>> >>> http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ____________________________________________________________
>>> __________________
>>> >> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>> >> Documentation:
>>> >> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>> >> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ____________________________________________________________
>>> __________________
>>> > Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>> > Documentation:
>>> > http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>> > FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> __________________
>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support
>>> /documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>>
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> __________________
>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support
>> /documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> __________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=
> syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> __________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?
> product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/attachments/20161223/7d629e6a/attachment.html>