[syslog-ng] Error in documentation on syslog() source port

[Patrick H.]

Actually I'm using both protocols, and I get the same behavior with both.

-Patrick

Sent: Mon Oct 03 2011 07:55:46 GMT-0600 (MST)
From: Clayton Dukes <cdukes at gmail.com>
To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list 
<syslog-ng at lists.balabit.hu>
Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] Error in documentation on syslog() source port
> Are you by chance using tcp? If so, the default is 601:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3195.txt
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> Clayton Dukes
> ______________________________________________________________
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Patrick H. <syslogng at feystorm.net 
> <mailto:syslogng at feystorm.net>> wrote:
>
>     The syslog-ng admin guide for 3.2 says the default port for
>     syslog() sources is 514. This isnt the observed behavior. When a
>     syslog() source is configured without specifying the port, it
>     listens on 601
>
>     ______________________________________________________________________________
>     Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>     Documentation:
>     http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>     FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/attachments/20111003/9a6e193a/attachment.htm