Re: [syslog-ng] HAVE_GETUTENT not defined
BTW, I recommend not using a standard function name for a local function. E.g. in this case, the local version of getutent is called getutent. That misled me for a while, because I assumed syslog-ng was actually calling standard getutent. It would be better for it to call syslogng_getutent() and have that call the real getutent() if it's available.
I don't want to add #ifdefs to the calling side of things. I know I could use macros, but then the calling side would not indicate that there's a private function implemented.
I'm with you on that, but I was suggesting something different. There is today an #ifdef in utils.c like this: #ifndef HAVE_GETUTENT struct utmp *getutent(void) { ... } #endif What I think works better is: #ifndef HAVE_GETUTENT struct utmp *my_getutent(void) { ... } #else struct utmp *my_getutent(void) { return getutent(); } #endif Or put the #ifdef inside my_getutent() or make my_getutent a macro. In any case, it eliminates more confusion and with less clutter than a comment saying "this getutent might not be the one you're thinking of". -- Bryan Henderson San Jose, California
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 21:15 +0000, Bryan Henderson wrote:
BTW, I recommend not using a standard function name for a local function. E.g. in this case, the local version of getutent is called getutent. That misled me for a while, because I assumed syslog-ng was actually calling standard getutent. It would be better for it to call syslogng_getutent() and have that call the real getutent() if it's available.
I don't want to add #ifdefs to the calling side of things. I know I could use macros, but then the calling side would not indicate that there's a private function implemented.
I'm with you on that, but I was suggesting something different. There is today an #ifdef in utils.c like this: [snip] Or put the #ifdef inside my_getutent() or make my_getutent a macro.
In any case, it eliminates more confusion and with less clutter than a comment saying "this getutent might not be the one you're thinking of".
But how would the calling site look like? -- Bazsi
participants (2)
-
Balazs Scheidler
-
bryanh@giraffe-data.com