After upgrade from 1.6.x to 1.9.9 netmask filter rule don't work. Write "syntax error at 188" on "netmask(149.49.32.121/255.255.255.255);". -- Olleg Samoylov
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 12:14 +0300, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
After upgrade from 1.6.x to 1.9.9 netmask filter rule don't work. Write "syntax error at 188" on "netmask(149.49.32.121/255.255.255.255);".
Ops, this has not yet been implemented in 1.9.x, I'll try to fill that gap ASAP. -- Bazsi
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:44 +0100, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 12:14 +0300, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
After upgrade from 1.6.x to 1.9.9 netmask filter rule don't work. Write "syntax error at 188" on "netmask(149.49.32.121/255.255.255.255);".
Ops, this has not yet been implemented in 1.9.x, I'll try to fill that gap ASAP.
I have just committed an implementation of the netmask() filter in my local tla tree, it should be available in tomorrow's snapshot (due in about an hour from now) -- Bazsi
participants (2)
-
Balazs Scheidler
-
Olleg Samoylov