syslog-ng hast no more facilities than old syslog?
Is it right that syslog-ng hat no more facilities than sylog-old? I hoped that I could take any name: root@rex2:~>logger -p 'hello.err' hello logger: unknown facility name: hallo. thx ekkard
* Ekkard Gerlach (me) wrote:
Is it right that syslog-ng has no more facilities than sylog-old?
sorry for my bad english. I wasn't able to write "has" corretly for two times.
I hoped that I could take any name: root@rex2:~>logger -p 'hello.err' hello logger: unknown facility name: hallo.
thx ekkard
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Ekkard Gerlach wrote:
Is it right that syslog-ng hat no more facilities than sylog-old?
I hoped that I could take any name: root@rex2:~>logger -p 'hello.err' hello logger: unknown facility name: hallo.
Syslog facilities are standardized, and fairly well established. Syslog-ng, as a tool, doesn't extend the syslog standard, it's simply a more robust implementation of the syslog standard. Chances are, any extensions you're considering fall fairly well inside established facilities and severities. - billn
What are you trying to do? Maybe the people on the list can point you into the right direction? Are you trying to log from a program say amavisd, all you do is create a filter and another log file. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ekkard Gerlach" <ekkardgerlach@aiai.de> To: <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 3:42 AM Subject: [syslog-ng]syslog-ng hast no more facilities than old syslog?
Is it right that syslog-ng hat no more facilities than sylog-old?
I hoped that I could take any name: root@rex2:~>logger -p 'hello.err' hello logger: unknown facility name: hallo.
thx ekkard _______________________________________________ syslog-ng maillist - syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Frequently asked questions at http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html
participants (3)
-
Bill Nash
-
Ekkard Gerlach
-
Jim Gifford