RE: 1.5 stable? was(Re: [syslog-ng]Feature Request)
How stable is 1.5? This looks like a very cool function that I would like to be able to use on our logserver. Is it stable enough for a production environment?
I use it in a production environment with 60 or 70 cisco switches and routers spitting syslog at my syslog-ng. I haven't had any dramas (my platform is Linux 2.2.19). memory usage is normal, no leaks evident. -afort
Cool. I use linux for all my clients and hosts. I might put a OpenRoute into the mix but it appears it uses syslog to send logs so no problem there. Using 2.2.18 on most of the servers but will be upgrading to 2.4.x as soon as possible ( at least on the firewall ). Thanks, sim Andrew Fort wrote:
How stable is 1.5? This looks like a very cool function that I would like to be able to use on our logserver. Is it stable enough for a production environment?
I use it in a production environment with 60 or 70 cisco switches and routers spitting syslog at my syslog-ng. I haven't had any dramas (my platform is Linux 2.2.19). memory usage is normal, no leaks evident.
-afort
_______________________________________________ syslog-ng maillist - syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
participants (2)
-
Andrew Fort
-
Simeon Johnston