New subject: Apache + syslog-ng w/o logger?

5 Feb 2010


      Thanks for the suggestions Jim & Lance.  I'm running CentOS 5 using the
default logger.  I did try what Lance suggested: restarting syslog-ng
w/ log_msg_size set to 65K in the options section (both the client and
server).  However, echo'ing a 8192 character string to logger resulted in
several fragments.  Guess it's on to Jim's suggestion...

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:00 AM, <syslog-ng-request@lists.balabit.hu> wrote:
...
Send syslog-ng mailing list submissions to
       syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       syslog-ng-request@lists.balabit.hu
You can reach the person managing the list at
       syslog-ng-owner@lists.balabit.hu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of syslog-ng digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re:  config file question (Rory Toma)
  2.  Apache + syslog-ng w/o logger? (Brian Donaldson)
  3. Re:  Apache + syslog-ng w/o logger? (Jim Hendrick)
  4. Re:  Apache + syslog-ng w/o logger? (Lance Laursen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:52:52 -0800
From: Rory Toma <rory@ooma.com>
Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] config file question
To: Zolt?n Pallagi <pzolee@balabit.hu>
Cc: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list
       <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>
Message-ID: <4B6B6BE4.30109@ooma.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On 2/2/10 4:49 AM, Zolt?n Pallagi wrote:
...
Hi Rory,
Will you tell me the current naming of your log files? I don't know
the real reason for many log files, but as Robert said, perhaps, there
are another easier solutions to avoid it.
We maintain one log file per client per day, in directory buckets of
2000 clients.

Re: [syslog-ng] Apache + syslog-ng w/o logger?

Brian Donaldson

Balazs Scheidler

tags

participants (2)