Hi Guys Wow, thanks for all your replies! So at least I'm not the only one having problems. - I'm running Debian testing with (self-compiled *boah*) Kernel 2.4.25 - I replaced syslog-ng with syslog until the issues are fixed - dpkg says I had the following syslog-ng installed: rc syslog-ng 1.9.9-1 Next generation logging daemon Really confusing, since Balazs is talking about 1.6.11 ... Do Debian maintainers follow a different numbering scheme? - My configuration is available as a download at http://mad4you.homeip.net/downloads/syslog-ng.conf . Note: It cannot be caused by this, since I soon replaced syslog-ng.conf with the one the original Debian package provided (to rule out exactly such a cause) Many thanks! Kind regards Mario -- Mario Aeby Stritenstrasse 47 CH-3176 Neuenegg Mobile 078 690 50 11 Fax 031 741 28 93 http://www.eMeidi.com/
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 19:32 +0200, Mario Aeby wrote:
Hi Guys
Wow, thanks for all your replies! So at least I'm not the only one having problems.
- I'm running Debian testing with (self-compiled *boah*) Kernel 2.4.25 - I replaced syslog-ng with syslog until the issues are fixed - dpkg says I had the following syslog-ng installed: rc syslog-ng 1.9.9-1 Next generation logging daemon Really confusing, since Balazs is talking about 1.6.11 ... Do Debian maintainers follow a different numbering scheme?
Oh, you are using the development series. There are currently two branches of syslog-ng: 1.6.x stable series, and the reimplementation of syslog-ng currently tagged as 1.9.x to become 2.0.0 once it stabilizes. If you are using 1.9.x the use of the latest snapshot is recommended. It was also affected by the same problem but no release was prepared since it was fixed. -- Bazsi
participants (2)
-
Balazs Scheidler
-
Mario Aeby