13 Sep
2010
13 Sep
'10
4:24 p.m.
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:59 -0500, Martin Holste wrote:
I think something like what Matthew has described would work to deal with the namespace issues. The hash table system seems like a good way of doing the CEE values that have been talked about, and could also pave the way for some pretty powerful stuff.
Well, as I see it, we do have this hashtable, it is the current name-value support. tags are an independent namespace, that's right, but do we really need to assign values to tags? Right now the patterndb concept links tags and name-value pairs together: the name of a tag is the same as the prefix of the associated name-value pairs. I don't really see the immediate benefit, but I might be missing something. -- Bazsi