27 Aug
2008
27 Aug
'08
10:35 a.m.
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:56 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Evan Rempel <erempel@uvic.ca> wrote:
Wouldn't the log_fetch_limit set to a large number allow for 1 second follow to process huge amounts of data. You would have to set the log_fifo_size large enough to host this number as well, but I don't see the requirement for the millisecond polling.
This is a good point, but since increasing the log_fifo_size means additional memory usage allowing millisecond polling allows me to make the tradeoff of CPU vs. memory. It may be that on this host I have more CPU to burn than memory.
Ok, that's a good point. -- Bazsi