2 Aug
2010
2 Aug
'10
3:25 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:44 -0700, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
I've reopened bug 87 (https://bugzilla.balabit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=87) because I think the greedy flag is still broken. I've updated the bug with my observations. Can someone else offer any more insight? Thanks.
Can you please give us concrete examples what input you give it and what your expectations are? It'd be especially useful if you could add the case to the unit test program (tests/unit/test_csvparser.c) by copying & adjusting the examples already there. It is quite tricky to get this right, so I'd like to avoid breaking it in the future. -- Bazsi