https://bugzilla.balabit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216 Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu> 2013-01-17 11:23:22 --- (In reply to comment #0)
IT does not matter if I use @LLADDR@, @LLADDR:mac@, @LLADDR:mac:6@ or @LLADDR::6@ I get the same results [...] <patterns> <pattern>DHCPDISCOVER from @LLADDR:mac:6@ @QSTRING:name:()@ via @IPv4:ip@</pattern> </patterns> [...] <test_message program="dhcpd">DHCPDISCOVER from e8:3e:b6:95:b2:38 (BLACKBERRY-27BD) via 142.104.103.253</test_message> <test_values> <test_value name="ip">142.104.103.253</test_value> <test_value name="mac">e8:3e:b6:95:b2:38</test_value> <test_value name="name">BLACKBERRY-27BD</test_value> </test_values> [...]
Thanks for the examples, I finally understood how you intended to use @LLADDR@, and why the way I rewrote it when picking it for 3.4 was wrong. I've picked the patch to 3.4, after adjusting the test cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.balabit.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.