Hello, On 08/23/2011 02:27 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Peter Czanik <czanik@balabit.hu> writes:
Hello,
I'm working on the 3.3 beta2 package for openSUSE and I wonder, if there is any reason to keep libafsocket-notls.so in the package. I faced a similar issue with the Debian package, and while I kept both -tls and -notls for now, I will drop -notls in the future.
If we'd want to provide a -notls package without openssl dependency, then there would be a reason to keep it. Otherwise, not so much.
The reason there's two is to allow one to choose. If we opt not to use that possibility, it's safe to drop it, in my experience.
(The next preview of my debian packages will drop -notls) Thanks for the explanations.
libafsocket-notls.so is now dropped from my openSUSE package, which should be available within a few hours at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/syslog-ng33/ Other changes include some hand picked fixes from git (which will be removed with the next 3.3 release): - working mongodb - versioned ".so" files are gone - fsf address is fixed This also means, that there are no more post build check errors in the openSUSE package, and only two "wontfix" warnings remained (like "%" sign in comments, which starts comments in rpm spec files). Bye, -- Peter Czanik (CzP) <czanik@balabit.hu> BalaBit IT Security / syslog-ng upstream http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/