Thanks, I will see if I can get a newer release from COPR. -Mark From: syslog-ng <syslog-ng-bounces@lists.balabit.hu> On Behalf Of Peter Czanik (pczanik) Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 01:57 To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: [syslog-ng] Breaking changes between versions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC. Hi, These are releases from many years ago, so I had to check the release notes. Normally there are no breaking changes, and we are careful about backwards compatibility. I could not find anything obvious in the release notes, so I would not expect any issues upgrading. However, as always, testing with production logs is still recommended. If you are upgrading from one point release to another one, I assume that you use my Copr packages. The versioned repositories are provided for convenience. Larger organizations have problems with the rolling release model, and it makes staying on a fixed syslog-ng release possible. Also, I do not have any influence on how packages are signed, that is something internal to Copr. Normally only the latest syslog-ng Copr repo is actively receiving fixes (syslog-ng48 as of right now). However, we might experiment a bit here, I put this on my ToDo list. Peter Peter Czanik (CzP) <mailto:peter.czanik@oneidentity.com> Balabit (a OneIdentity company) / syslog-ng upstream https://syslog-ng.com/community/ https://twitter.com/PCzanik ________________________________________ From: syslog-ng <mailto:syslog-ng-bounces@lists.balabit.hu> on behalf of Faine, Mark R. (MSFC-IS64)[AEGIS] <mailto:mark.faine@nasa.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 19:43 To: Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <mailto:syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu> Subject: [syslog-ng] Breaking changes between versions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I need to go from 3.31.2 to 3.37.1. Should I expect any breaking changes? Also, Redhat Insights is reporting that syslog-ng and syslog-ng-logrotate are signed with SHA1, are the newer packages signed with SHA2? Red Hat recommends that you adopt any of the options below: * Contact vendors of the packages to ask for new builds signed with supported signatures and re-install the new packages, * Resign packages with your own SHA-2 key or completely remove packages until a new build with SHA-2 signature is available from the 3rd-party vendor Thanks, Mark