1 Mar
2011
1 Mar
'11
8:54 p.m.
Op 01-03-11 21:31, Balazs Scheidler schreef:
It's just your use-case seems to be a perfectly valid scenario. We can rule it out for now, but I guess it'll come back later :)
... in which case you *do* need a double database, because the patterns are identical. Personally, I'd vote for the extra-patterndb-scenario. V.