21 Feb
2011
21 Feb
'11
6:22 p.m.
Op 21-02-11 18:20, Gergely Nagy schreef:
for reasons beyond my control), and it doesn't have /proc/net/xt_recent, only /proc/net/ipt_recent.
I haven't tried whether that works the same or not, as I'd have to go through a lot of pain to gain access to the box if anything goes wrong.
ipt_recent is the older name of the current xt_recent thing. In fact, my preliminary tests with -m recent were conducted on an older box with ipt_recent. I think they are almost the same; but ipt_recent doesn't have a "+" in front of the IP-addresses. Change your template accordingly and you're set. V.