Agree w/ Chris - it's good to see the updates. ______________________________________________________________ Clayton Dukes ______________________________________________________________ On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Christopher Barry < christopher.barry@rackwareinc.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 21:46 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
Hi,
I intend to make the development of syslog-ng even more transparent and this means that more and more patches and development related questions needs to be discussed. See for instance the last e-mail about linking options.
The big question is whether these discussions should be moved to a separate list, or rather it should stay here.
I don't have a definitive view, as I read both development and non-development discussions, but I guess there are others on this list, who couldn't care less about linking options, patches and whatnot. But even for a user, seeing what kind of features are development, might be useful information, even if the code itself is less interesting.
For me, it is more convinient as it is now.
The question is how you, the other list members think about it?
Please share your thoughts. Thanks.
I like the extra data. If it does not interest me, I can always delete it.
-C
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html