26 Apr
2002
26 Apr
'02
3:15 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:36:13PM +0200, Jerome Peducasse wrote:
Yes, of course but I like none of these propositions. I would like loghost stays independent of network updates (update of IP, subnet...).
I'm sorry Jerome but this is a common problem seen everywhere. Everyone else hardcodes a small number of critical IPs that their systems needs to have in their config files. These are usually loghosts, nameservers, time servers, NIS/NIS+ servers, etc. This is a fact of life. If you come up with something the rest of the world hasn't thought of, we're all ears. -- "Java is, in many ways, C++--." - Michael Feldman.