On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:16 -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
What about catch_all?
I thought there was some equivalence of - and _ respected in syslog-ng conf files.
yes, good catch. published a patch that adds this. again, still on 3.2
Matthew.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:36:45AM +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your contribution, I've pushed this patch to the 3.2 version that fixes the issue. (which is basically the same as you suggested):
commit da3c99f6d77b87edaa9bbc83814123a6f8895644 Author: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@balabit.hu> Date: Fri Apr 8 00:32:35 2011 +0200
Recognize both "catch-all" and "catchall" because of a documentation bug
The documentation referred to "catchall" whereas syslog-ng expected "catch-all". Now accept both.
Reported-By: Mishou Michael <Michael.Mishou@csirc.irs.gov> Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@balabit.hu>
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html
-- Bazsi