In fact, this is the same process... There is only one process. 2010/11/16 Martin Holste <mcholste@gmail.com>
Why do you need separate syslog-ng processes running?
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Yann I. <yann.frm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi !
I have a question about the use of udp, unix-stream or pipe. I would like to forward a syslog message to the same syslog server like this :
| log { | source (s_r_udp); (<-- listen on UDP/514) | | filter (....); | filter (....); | parser (...); | | destination (d_local_syslog); (<-- send the message to a local syslog by using unix-stream, udp or pipe mecanism) | };
(...)
| log { | source (s_local_syslog); (<--- here I receive the messages sent by the "d_syslog_loop") | | filter (...); | filter (...); | parser (...); | | destination (d_remote_syslog);
I'm looking for the better way to send syslog message to the same syslog server : which mecanism provides the better performances : pipe, udp (by using network) or unix-stream ? Maybe the "pipe" is the better solution ?...
I'm using the syslog-ng OSE 3.1.2 on CentOS.
Regards,
Yann I.
______________________________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html
______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html