VK: I'd be happy to test a beta of the port for Endian issues on Sparc64 and AMD64. I've also got a variety of 5x and 6x boxes on both archs on which I can smash bugs. Just gotta cane `em. I can also do the NetBSD pkgsrc work in pkgsrc-wip.sf.net ~BAS On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
You should try to work closely with the FreeBSD port maintainer for sysutils/syslog-ng to integrate 2.x into a Port. Unless there is a liscencing restriction I don't know preventing a enw sysutils/syslog-ng2/ port, we're still at 1.6.11 in Ports.
I am still evaluating whether I will be using this software in our infrastructure. If I do (which seems likely), I plan to adopt the port once 2.0 is released. I don't see a compelling reason to keep a separate 2.0 version of the port as it is back-compatible, and I believe that the base port name, syslog-ng, should be the latest version always. That's how I maintain the postfix port, too :-)
l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were."