[tproxy] Backport to 2.6.24

John Lauro john.lauro at covenanteyes.com
Mon Jul 13 15:25:17 CEST 2009


Does Ubuntu add anything to 2.6.24 why you wouldn't want to just run the
latest kernel from source on Ubuntu instead?  I do that with Redhat and
Centos and they have lots of extras in the kernel...


(Not suggesting it would be difficult, just why bother when it's easier just
to go forward?)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tproxy-bounces at lists.balabit.hu [mailto:tproxy-
> bounces at lists.balabit.hu] On Behalf Of Balazs Scheidler
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:58 AM
> To: Harry Mason
> Cc: tproxy at lists.balabit.hu
> Subject: Re: [tproxy] Backport to 2.6.24
> 
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 14:58 +0100, Harry Mason wrote:
> > Has anyone backported TPROXY to 2.6.24, the kernel used in Ubuntu
> Hardy?
> > Any reason why it'd be difficult or impossible?
> >
> 
> apart from the network virtualization stuff that caused us headaches
> when porting the patches forward, it should relatively easy.
> 
> but if you have a specific problem, just ask, we might help.
> 
> --
> Bazsi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tproxy mailing list
> tproxy at lists.balabit.hu
> https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/tproxy
> 
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.83/2191 - Release Date:
> 07/01/09 05:53:00



More information about the tproxy mailing list