[tproxy] Inclusion of tproxy 4.x in mainline kernel

[Balazs Scheidler]

On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:33 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:31 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:03 +0500, Anton wrote:
> > > Any hope this will be ever done?
> > > 
> > > On Monday 01 September 2008 23:59, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 17:33 +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a TODO list that lists what is keeping tproxy
> > > > > from beeing included in the mainline kernel ?
> > > > >
> > > > > It's features are quite usefull, and inclusion in a
> > > > > vanilla kernel saves us a whole lot of manual patching
> > > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > Sure, there are two items on my todo list to check:
> > > >  * ICMP support (we have this in our forked tproxy 4.0
> > > > branch, but not in 4.1)
> > 
> > I've just finished this. Krisztian is working on integrating the patches
> > in his stgit repo.
> > 
> > Until then, please find them attached. The patches are relative to this
> > patch-tree:
> > 
> > 
> > http://people.netfilter.org/hidden/tproxy/tproxy4-2.6.26-200809241501.tar.bz2
> > 
> > > >  * SNAT after tproxy, it should work, but there are
> > > > reports that it does not
> > 
> > I'm going to check out this next.
> > 
> > > >  * bridge <> tproxy interactions
> > > 
> > 
> > The netfilter workshop is going to be held next week, I hope we can get
> > these patches in shape until then.
> > 

And with this patch SNAT also works.

Again, relative to the 2.6.26 patch tree (so the previous patch is not
needed if you apply this)

-- 
Bazsi