[tproxy] Fwd: Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT

Herlon Alcantara Matos herlon at lcimt.com.br
Mon Oct 15 13:51:41 CEST 2007


What is the correct version of squid for implementation of tproxy 4.03.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "KOVACS Krisztian" <hidden at sch.bme.hu>
To: "Arun S" <hi2arun at gmail.com>
Cc: <tproxy at lists.balabit.hu>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [tproxy] Fwd: Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT


> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:22:26PM +0200, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:30:03PM +0530, Arun S wrote:
>> > I am not aware of this. I have tried tproxy4.0.3 and
>> > Squid-2.6-STABLE14. But real transparency was not happening. Does it
>> > require support from the application too?
>>
>> Yes, and the modifications it requires are different compared to those of
>> required by tproxy2.
>>
>> > Could you please throw some light on this?
>>
>> I don't have a patch for squid at the moment but creating one should be
>> quite straigtforward. I'll try to come up with one once I find the time 
>> to
>> do so.
>>
>> A very brief README:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119229721212273&w=2
>>
>> As an example, here's the patch necessary to make netcat work:
>> http://people.netfilter.org/hidden/tproxy/netcat-ip_transparent-support.patch
>
> Oh, sorry -- in case of 4.0.3 these are not the right pointers. Take a
> look at the documentation and examples which come with the downloaded
> package.
>
> -- 
> KOVACS Krisztian
> _______________________________________________
> tproxy mailing list
> tproxy at lists.balabit.hu
> https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/tproxy 



More information about the tproxy mailing list