[tproxy] Fwd: Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT

[KOVACS Krisztian]

Hi,

On p, okt 12, 2007 at 02:43:57 +0530, Arun S wrote:
> May be others could help you on this.. forgot to copy to tproxy list.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Arun S <hi2arun at gmail.com>
> Date: 11 Oct 2007 16:30
> Subject: Re: [tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT
> To: "Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos]" <sonny at itclick.net>
> 
> 
> Yes Sonny, you can very well use cttproxy2 for your purpose.
> 
> :)
> 
> On 11/10/2007, Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos] <sonny at itclick.net> wrote:
> > Arun,
> >
> > Thanks! This must be the problem am having. I will rebuild my kernel based
> > on cttproxy2.  I appreciate your feedback.
> >
> > Sonny.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arun S [mailto:hi2arun at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:03 AM
> > To: Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos]
> > Subject: Re: [tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > AFAIK tproxy4 is just a replacement for the conventional REDIRECT rule.
> >
> > Cttproxy2 provides the real transparency that you mentioned.

Arun, this is definitely not the case. The tproxy4 feature set is exactly
the same as that of tproxy2, it's not just a replacement for REDIRECT.

-- 
KOVACS Krisztian