[tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT

Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos] sonny at itclick.net
Wed Oct 10 23:26:12 CEST 2007


For use with squid 2.6, what is the main difference between cttproxy2 and
tproxy4? Still trying to find my feet getting tproxy4 to provide real
transparency with squid. Any pointer will help


-----Original Message-----
From: tproxy-bounces at lists.balabit.hu
[mailto:tproxy-bounces at lists.balabit.hu] On Behalf Of Arun S
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Tproxy
Subject: Re: [tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT

Hi Bazsi,

The patch was not included with the previous mail.

Please find the patch in text format.

On 10/10/2007, Arun S <hi2arun at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bazsi,
> Thank you for a nice work that provides real transparency to both web 
> users and web servers.
> :)
> I am using cttproxy v2.0.6 on linux kernel v2.6.18.1 along with Squid
> Cttproxy is used to provide transparency to both web server and client 
> and also to cache web requests.
> Sometimes it is required to SNAT HTTP traffic that is not possible 
> with Cttproxy-v2.0.6; since double NAT is not possible.
> Here is a patch attached to solve that issue.
> This patch helps to perform SNAT in POSTROUTING chain of TPROXY table 
> as well as in POSTROUTING chain of NAT table.
> Can you please validate this patch let me know your concerns.
> --
> Regards,
> Arun S.

Arun S.

More information about the tproxy mailing list