[tproxy] TProxy version 4.0.0 released
Balazs Scheidler
bazsi at balabit.hu
Tue Jul 31 13:13:28 CEST 2007
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 12:45 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jul 31 2007 12:31, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> >
> >MD5 checksums of the tarballs:
> >
> >a655fd090c06827bd6927f2b894ee178 tproxy-4.0.0-2.6.23-rc1.tgz
> >d7175531d67beaab48293cd86cac5d21 tproxy-4.0.0-ubuntu-2.6.17-12.39.tgz
>
> That can not compile, because there are still a lot of merge markers.
>
>
> @@ -1950,7 +2065,14 @@ int ip_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr,
> rth->fl.fl4_src == saddr &&
> rth->fl.iif == iif &&
> rth->fl.oif == 0 &&
> +<<<<<<< HEAD:net/ipv4/route.c
> rth->fl.mark == skb->mark &&
> +=======
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK
> + rth->fl.fl4_fwmark == skb->nfmark &&
> +#endif
> + !(rth->u.dst.flags & DST_DIVERTED) &&
> +>>>>>>> 2bc8cb4... initial import of tproxy4 (2007-07-30):net/ipv4/route.c
> rth->fl.fl4_tos == tos) {
> rth->u.dst.lastuse = jiffies;
> dst_hold(&rth->u.dst);
Looks like we did not resolve all conflicts when forward-porting to
2.6.23.
The version on top of Ubuntu 2.6.17-12.39 was the one that has been
tested, but we thought that we should release to a more current version
as well.
So in summary, the 2.6.17 based patch should be considered 'reasonably'
stable, the other is completely untested.
By the way, let me introduce Panther, he is going to be the new tproxy
maintainer.
As an additional item of interest, we've also published an experimental
git tree to http://people.balabit.hu/panther/tproxy4.git/
--
Bazsi
More information about the tproxy
mailing list