[syslog-ng] need help debugging some network received logs that aren't writing to files
Shashank Rohatgi
srck85 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 05:17:40 CET 2014
So here was the issue.
having udp(so_rcvbuf(1024000) in the syslog-ng conf was creating the issue.
when i commented this it would have visibility only to the logs specificly
forwarded to it..
And talking about log rotation,
Any ideas other than using $YEAR/$MONTH/ basically date parameters to
rotate logs on and successfully have crrons to delete them?
regards
Shashank
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Evan Rempel <erempel at uvic.ca> wrote:
> Do you have any log rotation?
> Is it possible that the log files got rotated/deleted but syslog still has the file handle open and continues to write to it. Since it never gets closed, it never needs to reopen it so it never detects the missing filename and never creates a new one.
>
> you can use lsof and search for "delete"
>
>
>
> Evan Rempel 250.271.7691
> University Systems, University of Victoria
>
> Chris Moody <chris at node-nine.com> wrote:
>
>
> ok - sorry for the latent reply folks - got wrangled into other
> troubleshooting efforts.
>
> Anyway, I've taken a deeper look at this and I'm experiencing this
> behavior when receiving logs from IOS, Nexus, and other device types as
> well..so it's not just some weird version/bug type issue with the received
> messages.
>
> The log hosts are both running:
> ===
> syslog-ng 3.2.5
> ===
>
> These are RHEL 6.2 VirtualMachines, each logging to their own dedicated
> 5-TB NFS mount. Plenty of CPU & Memory overhead. I'm not seeing any
> issues with I/O-wait to the NFS mounts. These hosts are -very- busy (from
> loads of firewall logs) but have been working beautifully in the past.
> This seems to be a relatively recent development...not sure how long though
> unfortunately.
>
> There are about 1000 current active spools on each host that are updating
> just fine when new messages come in. I'm just experiencing where some of
> the spool files have gone stale and don't get written to any longer
> (despite messages being received) as well as no new spools get created.
> It's like the destination directive isn't being adhered-to.
> ===
> destination net_perhost {
> file("/data/log/per-host/$HOST"
> owner(root)
> group(nwadmin)
> perm(0755)
> );
> };
> ===
> This should be creating a new log spool per-host upon receipt of logs over
> the wire...and it's working...but not 100% any longer it seems.
>
> I've done tcpdump captures of the nodes that I'm having trouble with and I
> do see the source-IP in all the 'hostname' fields...so it's not like these
> are coming through as malformed which was a good first-pass thought. Even
> tried toggling 'keep_hostname' to no (currently 'yes') and that doesn't
> seem to help.
>
> I have tried sending logs from some new systems to these aggregators and
> they are not creating new spools either. I've run tcpdump to confirm the
> message receipt, but no new files are being written for new devices either.
>
> It's almost behaving like perhaps there's too many files being written
> to...too many open filehandles... something along these lines perhaps.
>
> Hoping for some other outside-perspective ideas of things I can check or
> debug as I've been trying to debug this too long...and am most likely
> staring at the issue right in the face.
>
> -Chris
>
> On 2/22/14 6:44 AM, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
>
> Latest syslog-ng versions parse some of the cisco extensions. Which
> version do you run?
> On Feb 18, 2014 11:20 PM, "Scot Needy" <scotrn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It wasn't adding the data to the hostname just adding extra header data
>> that broke the RFC format.
>>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Chris Moody <chris at node-nine.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm... that's a thought. The troublesome device is an IOS system.
>> > I'llgive 'er a gander to see if there are any other options. I don't
>> > recall there being any that controlled the 'hostname' header field
>> though.
>> >
>> > -Chris
>> >
>> > On 2/18/14 5:10 PM, Scot Needy wrote:
>> >> We had a parsing problem on our ASA where the log contained an extra
>> date so the Host looked like "Feb".
>> >>
>> >> There was a syslog option in the ASA not to send the date in the
>> header.
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 18, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Chris Moody <chris at node-nine.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> yes - there are tons of spool files being created successfully. As any
>> >>> new network device starts logging we see a new log-spool get created
>> for
>> >>> it's source-ip.
>> >>>
>> >>> Tons of free disk space - almost a Tb of free room. Loads of
>> >>> processor/mem overhead. Nothing glaring in syslog-ng's logs (like
>> >>> unable to write or whatnot)
>> >>>
>> >>> Just debugging a host-device that we're not seeing logs accounted for.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Chris
>> >>>
>> >>> On 2/18/14 3:51 PM, Austin Jorden wrote:
>> >>>> Hi Chris,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Are there *any* folders/files being created at all?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There's one thing I noticed that isn't specified... which is the
>> >>>> "createdirs = Yes" option. It appears (well, I assume) that you're
>> >>>> wanting it to create a separate text file for each $HOST, not a
>> separate
>> >>>> directory named $HOST...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> - Austin
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 2/18/2014 2:12 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
>> >>>>> Hello.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> First off, thanks a __TON__ for syslog-ng. I've sworn by this
>> awesome
>> >>>>> code for years now. I've built all sorts of logging infrastructure
>> with
>> >>>>> it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I seem to have hit on something though that's got me scratching my
>> head
>> >>>>> and lacking for explanation. Perhaps I've just been staring at it
>> and
>> >>>>> debugging it too long and am missing something obvious.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I've got an installation with a couple thousand network devices
>> logging
>> >>>>> successfully to output spools on our log aggretor. This is rockin'
>> and
>> >>>>> works beautifully. I've got things configured whereby each network
>> >>>>> source logs to it's own individual spool file with the source-ip as
>> the
>> >>>>> spool name.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'm running into a case though where I have a Cisco switch sending
>> logs
>> >>>>> to my log aggregator but the log-server isn't writing the output to
>> the
>> >>>>> device's spool file. It is working however for many many more
>> devices
>> >>>>> just like this switch.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I've confirmed via tcpdump that this log traffic does actually hit
>> the
>> >>>>> box, but it never gets recorded into the log spool for that network
>> device.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Since the host is -super- busy receiving logs from other gear
>> >>>>> enterprise-wide, I have to treat it very gingerly, so can't enable
>> too
>> >>>>> much debugging...but I'm really confused why the logs wouldn't show
>> up
>> >>>>> in the log spool..
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Here's some bits of the config that are relevant:
>> >>>>> =====
>> >>>>> options {
>> >>>>> keep_hostname(yes);
>> >>>>> use_dns(no);
>> >>>>> use_fqdn(no);
>> >>>>> stats_freq(600);
>> >>>>> stats_level(2);
>> >>>>> # Allow large messages
>> >>>>> log_msg_size(65536);
>> >>>>> };
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> # =====================
>> >>>>> # UDP Packet Source
>> >>>>> source s_udp {
>> >>>>> udp();
>> >>>>> };
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> # =====================
>> >>>>> # TCP Packet Source
>> >>>>> source s_tcp {
>> >>>>> tcp(ip(aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) port(514)
>> max-connections(50000));
>> >>>>> };
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> # =====================
>> >>>>> destination net_perhost {
>> >>>>> file("/data/log/per-host/$HOST"
>> >>>>> owner(root)
>> >>>>> group(nwadmin)
>> >>>>> perm(0775)
>> >>>>> );
>> >>>>> };
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> # =====================
>> >>>>> log {
>> >>>>> source(s_tcp);
>> >>>>> source(s_udp);
>> >>>>> destination(net_perhost);
>> >>>>> };
>> >>>>> =====
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I've checked around for perhaps a different spool name, thinking
>> perhaps
>> >>>>> the data was getting recognized as something other than it's
>> source-ip,
>> >>>>> but haven't seen anything.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Any thoughts?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>> -Chris
>> >>>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> >>>>> Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> >>>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> >>>> Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> >>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> >>> Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> >>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>> >>>
>> >>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> >> Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> >> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> > Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> > Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> > FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>> >
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> Documentation:
>> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation:
> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/attachments/20140306/12b6f614/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the syslog-ng
mailing list