[syslog-ng] need help debugging some network received logs that aren't writing to files
Scot Needy
scotrn at gmail.com
Tue Feb 18 23:21:51 CET 2014
It wasn’t adding the data to the hostname just adding extra header data that broke the RFC format.
On Feb 18, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Chris Moody <chris at node-nine.com> wrote:
> Hmm... that's a thought. The troublesome device is an IOS system.
> I'llgive 'er a gander to see if there are any other options. I don't
> recall there being any that controlled the 'hostname' header field though.
>
> -Chris
>
> On 2/18/14 5:10 PM, Scot Needy wrote:
>> We had a parsing problem on our ASA where the log contained an extra date so the Host looked like “Feb”.
>>
>> There was a syslog option in the ASA not to send the date in the header.
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Chris Moody <chris at node-nine.com> wrote:
>>
>>> yes - there are tons of spool files being created successfully. As any
>>> new network device starts logging we see a new log-spool get created for
>>> it's source-ip.
>>>
>>> Tons of free disk space - almost a Tb of free room. Loads of
>>> processor/mem overhead. Nothing glaring in syslog-ng's logs (like
>>> unable to write or whatnot)
>>>
>>> Just debugging a host-device that we're not seeing logs accounted for.
>>>
>>> -Chris
>>>
>>> On 2/18/14 3:51 PM, Austin Jorden wrote:
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Are there *any* folders/files being created at all?
>>>>
>>>> There's one thing I noticed that isn't specified... which is the
>>>> "createdirs = Yes" option. It appears (well, I assume) that you're
>>>> wanting it to create a separate text file for each $HOST, not a separate
>>>> directory named $HOST...
>>>>
>>>> - Austin
>>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2014 2:12 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> First off, thanks a __TON__ for syslog-ng. I've sworn by this awesome
>>>>> code for years now. I've built all sorts of logging infrastructure with
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seem to have hit on something though that's got me scratching my head
>>>>> and lacking for explanation. Perhaps I've just been staring at it and
>>>>> debugging it too long and am missing something obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got an installation with a couple thousand network devices logging
>>>>> successfully to output spools on our log aggretor. This is rockin' and
>>>>> works beautifully. I've got things configured whereby each network
>>>>> source logs to it's own individual spool file with the source-ip as the
>>>>> spool name.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm running into a case though where I have a Cisco switch sending logs
>>>>> to my log aggregator but the log-server isn't writing the output to the
>>>>> device's spool file. It is working however for many many more devices
>>>>> just like this switch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've confirmed via tcpdump that this log traffic does actually hit the
>>>>> box, but it never gets recorded into the log spool for that network device.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the host is -super- busy receiving logs from other gear
>>>>> enterprise-wide, I have to treat it very gingerly, so can't enable too
>>>>> much debugging...but I'm really confused why the logs wouldn't show up
>>>>> in the log spool..
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's some bits of the config that are relevant:
>>>>> =====
>>>>> options {
>>>>> keep_hostname(yes);
>>>>> use_dns(no);
>>>>> use_fqdn(no);
>>>>> stats_freq(600);
>>>>> stats_level(2);
>>>>> # Allow large messages
>>>>> log_msg_size(65536);
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> # =====================
>>>>> # UDP Packet Source
>>>>> source s_udp {
>>>>> udp();
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> # =====================
>>>>> # TCP Packet Source
>>>>> source s_tcp {
>>>>> tcp(ip(aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) port(514) max-connections(50000));
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> # =====================
>>>>> destination net_perhost {
>>>>> file("/data/log/per-host/$HOST"
>>>>> owner(root)
>>>>> group(nwadmin)
>>>>> perm(0775)
>>>>> );
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> # =====================
>>>>> log {
>>>>> source(s_tcp);
>>>>> source(s_udp);
>>>>> destination(net_perhost);
>>>>> };
>>>>> =====
>>>>>
>>>>> I've checked around for perhaps a different spool name, thinking perhaps
>>>>> the data was getting recognized as something other than it's source-ip,
>>>>> but haven't seen anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Chris
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>>>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________
>> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
>> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
>> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
>
More information about the syslog-ng
mailing list