[syslog-ng] [list admin] discussion of patches

[Clayton Dukes]

Agree w/ Chris - it's good to see the updates.

______________________________________________________________

Clayton Dukes
______________________________________________________________


On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Christopher Barry <
christopher.barry at rackwareinc.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 21:46 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I intend to make the development of syslog-ng even more transparent and
> > this means that more and more patches and development related questions
> > needs to be discussed. See for instance the last e-mail about linking
> > options.
> >
> > The big question is whether these discussions should be moved to a
> > separate list, or rather it should stay here.
> >
> > I don't have a definitive view, as I read both development and
> > non-development discussions, but I guess there are others on this list,
> > who couldn't care less about linking options, patches and whatnot. But
> > even for a user, seeing what kind of features are development, might be
> > useful information, even if the code itself is less interesting.
> >
> > For me, it is more convinient as it is now.
> >
> > The question is how you, the other list members think about it?
> >
> > Please share your thoughts.
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I like the extra data. If it does not interest me, I can always delete
> it.
>
> -C
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation:
> http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/attachments/20110503/3890311d/attachment.htm