[syslog-ng] [list admin] discussion of patches
Ray Van Dolson
rvandolson at esri.com
Tue May 3 21:48:15 CEST 2011
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:46:47PM -0700, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to make the development of syslog-ng even more transparent and
> this means that more and more patches and development related questions
> needs to be discussed. See for instance the last e-mail about linking
> options.
>
> The big question is whether these discussions should be moved to a
> separate list, or rather it should stay here.
>
> I don't have a definitive view, as I read both development and
> non-development discussions, but I guess there are others on this list,
> who couldn't care less about linking options, patches and whatnot. But
> even for a user, seeing what kind of features are development, might be
> useful information, even if the code itself is less interesting.
>
> For me, it is more convinient as it is now.
>
> The question is how you, the other list members think about it?
>
> Please share your thoughts.
> Thanks.
I'd vote for a separate list. Those users interested in the patches
and development discussion could also subscribe to that list.
Just my two cents!
Thanks,
Ray
More information about the syslog-ng
mailing list