[syslog-ng]fully qualified hostname help

[Dawson, Kevin]

Actually both - the remote hosts are running syslog-ng as well with the
exception of the routers which simply spit out messages w/o a syslog daemon.
BTW, the syslogd daemon was able to resolve the full hostname without any
entries in the /etc/hosts file.  I changed to syslog-ng...no full hostnames.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Campi [mailto:nate@campin.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:45 PM
To: syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu
Subject: Re: [syslog-ng]fully qualified hostname help


Also, are you referring to locally generated syslog messages or ones
from remote hosts? The difference is important.

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:19:47PM -0700, Allen Bettilyon wrote:
> Do you have the hosts listed in /etc/hosts?
> 
> -- Allen
> 
> "Dawson, Kevin" wrote:
> 
> > I'm sure this has been asked a thousand times before (although I
couldn't
> > find it in the archives), but here it goes.  My options line reads:
> >
> > options { sync(0); time_reopen(10); log_fifo_size(100);
long_hostnames(yes);
> > chain_hostnames(yes); };
> >
> > I'm running version 1.4.12 on Solaris and the problem is my messages are
> > still listing the short hostname.  Any thoughts on this?

-- 
Nate Campi                  <nate@campin.net>
GnuPG key: 0xC17AEF79   http://www.campin.net 

But, for my own part, it was Greek to me.
		-- William Shakespeare, "Julius Caesar"


_______________________________________________
syslog-ng maillist  -  syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu
https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng