Hi! Sorry for being hungarian. Here is the translation:
Sorry for the oftopic question. Is it good if the development/fixes forked?
It isn't a fork, this is why the unofficial zorp is official. The fixes will be get back to zorp-gpl. It is simply that zorp-gpl have been neglected a bit, and I could not see this. The other side is that there are things which do not or only to a little extent related to the core, and I want to play with anyway. Bazsi do not want to see these features in their version until they aren't rock solid, and the users get the feeling of the ideas behind (zorp builds on a lot of concepts even right now which not understandable for a simple firewall administrator used to fw-1). You cannot yet see too much of these yet, because it is very disgusting to look through the code line-by-line to spot that few points which should not made public. But for example the filltable utility goes to this direction (well, it is not core to the extent that it isn't even zorp). For more details see http://zorp-unoff.sourceforge.net/index-3.html -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból