Hi, On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:48:47AM +0200, Michael Gaisinsky wrote:

On Wed Nov 14 22:35:19 CET 2007 Cameron Schaus wrote: "I have done some previous investigation around using tproxy4 code on a bridge interface. I found that the bridge code clobbers the dst route entry added by tproxy4 during prerouting, and that packets processed by tproxy destined for the localhost need to be marked with a packet type of PACKET_HOST otherwise they are dropped higher up the stack.

I don't have a patch right now, but I can get you a diff of the bridge code changes needed to make this work if you are interested. The changes are fairly minor.

Cam"

I would like to get an assistance in one of the following ways: 1. If exist, to get the patch for the "the bridge code changes". 2. Diff between original source code and modified one. 3. More guidance for code area(s) that need to be modified.

I think you're not the only one interested in these changes. Cam, could you post your patch implementing the necessary changes to make bridged tproxy work? -- KOVACS Krisztian