Re: [tproxy] TProxy patch for 2.6.26 and Squid 3.HEAD news (heads-up)
Hi all, This is to confirm that the NF-SNAT functionality with tproxy4 is working with no issues for the scenarios mentioned below: Details of packages used: Kernel version: 2.6.26 Tproxy version: tproxy4-2.6.26-200809262032 iptables version: tproxy-iptables-1.4.0-20080521-113954-1211362794 Squid version: squid-3.HEAD-20081021 Scenarios: 1. Full transparency - Yes 2. Full transparency with SNAT (NF - POSTROUTING) - Yes 3. Client-side transparency (interception only) - Yes I didn't test this with bridging enabled. Regards, Arun S. 2008/10/1 KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@sch.bme.hu>:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 05:20:10PM +0530, Arun Srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
Should I take iptables source patch from the git repo or this patch tproxy-iptables-1.4.0-20080521-113954-1211362794.patch would do?
It's okay, however it won't apply to iptables version 1.4.1 or above.
-- KOVACS Krisztian
-- Regards, Arun S.
Hi Arun, On k, okt 21, 2008 at 07:01:43 +0530, Arun Srinivasan wrote:
Hi all,
This is to confirm that the NF-SNAT functionality with tproxy4 is working with no issues for the scenarios mentioned below:
Details of packages used:
Kernel version: 2.6.26 Tproxy version: tproxy4-2.6.26-200809262032 iptables version: tproxy-iptables-1.4.0-20080521-113954-1211362794 Squid version: squid-3.HEAD-20081021
Scenarios: 1. Full transparency - Yes 2. Full transparency with SNAT (NF - POSTROUTING) - Yes 3. Client-side transparency (interception only) - Yes
Thank you very much for your feedback. Really appreciated.
I didn't test this with bridging enabled.
Based on previous reports I'd expect that it does not work with bridging enabled. I haven't tried it myself, though. -- KOVACS Krisztian
participants (2)
-
Arun Srinivasan
-
KOVACS Krisztian