2 Feb
2005
2 Feb
'05
4:18 p.m.
Hi, 2005-02-02, sze keltezéssel 08.11-kor Siming Li ezt írta:
From #2 and #4, the overhead of one NAT is 120 Mbits/s.
#1 (fully transparency) is too bad....It should be around 430 Mbits (671 - 120 * 2 since two NATs )
Does anyone know why the performance drops so drastically when using fully-transparency???
Hmm, good question. I have to admit that I did not do such performance tests (yet), but the version you're using is quite old -- I'd even say it's from the stone age :). Would it be possible for you to try a bit more up-to-date version and see if its behaviour is the same? (1.2.1, for example.) -- Regards, Krisztian Kovacs