On Jul 31 2007 13:13, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
Looks like we did not resolve all conflicts when forward-porting to 2.6.23.
The version on top of Ubuntu 2.6.17-12.39 was the one that has been tested, but we thought that we should release to a more current version as well.
So in summary, the 2.6.17 based patch should be considered 'reasonably' stable, the other is completely untested.
Is there a 'socket' match at all in balabit's tree? As far as I understand, I need xt_socket because otherwise, traffic to [foreign address on local socket] is forwarded to the real host.
By the way, let me introduce Panther, he is going to be the new tproxy maintainer.
As an additional item of interest, we've also published an experimental git tree to http://people.balabit.hu/panther/tproxy4.git/
403. Not a good day, today, is it? :) Jan --