Hi, On p, okt 12, 2007 at 02:43:57 +0530, Arun S wrote:
May be others could help you on this.. forgot to copy to tproxy list.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arun S <hi2arun@gmail.com> Date: 11 Oct 2007 16:30 Subject: Re: [tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT To: "Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos]" <sonny@itclick.net>
Yes Sonny, you can very well use cttproxy2 for your purpose.
:)
On 11/10/2007, Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos] <sonny@itclick.net> wrote:
Arun,
Thanks! This must be the problem am having. I will rebuild my kernel based on cttproxy2. I appreciate your feedback.
Sonny.
-----Original Message----- From: Arun S [mailto:hi2arun@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:03 AM To: Sunday A. Idajili [ITClick Lagos] Subject: Re: [tproxy] Tproxy changes for performing dual NAT
Hi,
AFAIK tproxy4 is just a replacement for the conventional REDIRECT rule.
Cttproxy2 provides the real transparency that you mentioned.
Arun, this is definitely not the case. The tproxy4 feature set is exactly the same as that of tproxy2, it's not just a replacement for REDIRECT. -- KOVACS Krisztian