Right, i realized this morning that perhaps i should have taken the patch from the panther area.

Nonetheless, the patch that i took from the hidden area, that had 2.6.25 in the name, i did get that to build by changing nf_tproxy_core.c to add a pointer to the "net" structure when calling lookup routines in udp.c.

I'll try the panther patches (http://people.balabit.hu/panther/tproxy/)  and see if they work any better.  When I look at the panther area, it is a ball of confusion.  there are two tproxy...bz2 files - which one to use ?  neither has any reference to 2.6.25 kernel in the name.

Also are the iptables-tproxy...diff  patch applicable to a certain version of iptables source ?




"Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@redtone.com>
Sent by: tproxy-bounces@lists.balabit.hu

03/11/2008 09:39 PM

To
"Tproxy list" <tproxy@lists.balabit.hu>
cc
Subject
Re: [tproxy] openSUSE 10.3 + squid + tproxy





Tom P Yohe wrote:
>> I am working on applying the tproxy4 patches to a 2.6.25rc4 kernel
>> that i downloaded from openSuse.
>>
>> I have run into a few snags. 3 of the patches did not take correctly
>> and required minor adjustment.
>>
>> Following this, I was surprised that the function prototype for
>> udp.c/__udp4_lib_lookup() now requires a "net *" as a first parameter
>> however this parameter is not passed to its close cousin that calls
>> it  - udp4_lib_lookup().  which is called by
>> netfilter\nf_tproxy_core.c:
>>
>> so as soon as i sort this all out, i will let you know. how i resolve
>> this.

It appears to me that you have gotten the wrong patch.

Cheers.

_______________________________________________
tproxy mailing list
tproxy@lists.balabit.hu
https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/tproxy