Eliezer Croitoru wrote, On 01/21/2015 08:40 PM:
I am unsure how expensive it was but the idea is ORIGINAL!!
Maybe I'm the first one using such a setup, ie. using public IPs within NAT :-) my (paranoid) setup: internet <--> NATrouter(192.168.1.1) <--> (192.168.1.2)2ndNATrouter(37.139.71.1) <--> (37.139.71.2)host(br0 10.10.20.1) and LXC container on the same host at 10.10.20.2) The 2ndNATrouter w/ open source firmware is just for safety against my very possibly government controlled ISP... :-) BTW, I don't think there was a neccessity for IPv6 at all b/c IPv4+port gives about 2^64*2^16 = 2^80 maximal connection partners, and that is a 24-digit number in base10; that's enough for the whole universe any beyond... cu Uenal
Eliezer
On 21/01/2015 18:19, U.Mutlu wrote:
If I find time I'll repeat the test with the 192.168 adress, but not now...:-) Phew.. this was a prohibitly hard & expensive job... took me about a week to finally come to this f..ing solution...:-)
cu Uenal