Hi Even,Yes I am using single quotes on this pattern. I added \s+ and that seems to resolve my issue. Looks like if it's a date in the 1-9 range it uses 2 spaces instead of one even though it doesn't seem to display it when I match on just a single \s. Strange but I think I have what I need so that this regex doesn't break when the days change from single days to double digit days.Thanks!Regards,Max______________________________________________________________________________On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Evan Rempel <erempel@uvic.ca> wrote:______________________________________________________________________________When using regular expressions that include the \ character (and perhaps others) they need to be in single quotes, not double quotes.
Also, the dates of the form Feb 8 10:11:54" often have a leading space on the day, so that your regex really needs to be '^\w+\s+\d+' to match bothFeb 9 10:11:54Feb 19 10:11:54
Not sure if that was your case, but it is a safer regex to cover such cases.
I cant speak to why the space gets eaten in your '8 09:55:54 CST: ' example.
Evan.
On 2/8/19 8:18 AM, N. Max Pierson wrote:
Hi List,
I am having some weird issues with rewrite regex that I cannot explain. I am simply trying to filter out the first part of the message which has the date in this format.
Feb 8 09:13:32 CST: (there is one space at the end)
When I use the following syntax, it doesn't match as expected.
^\w+\s\d+\s\d+:\d+:\d+\s\w+:\s
I know this is the correct pattern because it works just fine on www.regexpal.com. I did some further testing and I have narrowed it down to the below ...
^\w+8 09:55:54 CST: (this seemed to also remove the space behind the month)
^\w+\s8 09:59:37 CST: (notice this is the exact same as the above without the beginning space)
^\w+\s\d+Feb 8 10:07:04 CST: (doesn't match anything as though the space between Feb and 8 isn't there)
^\w+\d+
Feb 8 10:11:54 CST: (again doesn't match anything as though there is a space between Feb and 8)
So it seems to be something either with \w word class or the + quantifier and it somehow eats the space behind it possibly?? I am running 3.19.1 on Centos 7.
Can anyone test this to confirm it isn't just local to my install for whatever reason?
Regards,Max
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
FAQ: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq