Hi Janani,

I am sorry, but I don't really understand you. Nevertheless, I am trying to answer you.
First of all, what kind of tests have you thought? Of course, we have tested the syslog protocol of the syslog-ng and it worked. If you have any question about this protocol, or found a bug, don't hesitate to tell us it.

Also, we have installer packages for the following platforms, as you can see:

debian-etch-amd64 Directory   2009-12-07
debian-etch-i386 Directory   2009-12-07
freebsd-6.1-i386 Directory   2009-12-07
linux-amd64 Directory   2009-12-07
linux-i386 Directory   2009-12-07
rhel-4-amd64 Directory   2009-12-07
rhel-4-i386 Directory   2009-12-07
rhel-5-amd64 Directory   2009-12-07
rhel-5-i386 Directory   2009-12-07
suse-10-i386 Directory   2009-12-07

This is just a list from our website (http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/sources/3.0.5/setups/).
Also, you can download the source code of syslog-ng and try to compile for your platform by manual.

If you need an official support, please contact us (http://www.balabit.com/company/contacts/)

Janani Janakiraman írta:

I am trying to judge the level of confidence for the latest stable open-source version of syslog-ng version 3.0.5. Where can I find the test results of the tests that have been run again version 3.0.5 of syslog-ng? I want to find out if tests have been run to test the new features in Version 3.x specifically support for the new IETF-syslog protocol standard ( RFC5424 ). Do any of the major Linux distros support version 3.x of syslog-ng?

Thanks,
Janani


______________________________________________________________________________
Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html

  


-- 
pzolee