On 2011-08-19, syslogng@feystorm.net wrote:
Secondly using a 32-bit checksum of the message text to determine uniqueness
is risky. It would be farily easy to end up with 2 different messages that
have the same checksum. A md5 checksum would be much better, but I dont
believe syslog-ng has a function to compute md5 sums.
One can delegate this task to the database itself. MySQL has MD5() as well
as SHA1() built in.
Its been a while since I've had syslog-ng talk to a database
directly, but when I did, you couldnt use database functions when
storing data. You just gave syslog-ng the names of the fields, and
then the macros to stick in those fields and syslog-ng went and
assembled the query for you. Does syslog-ng let you construct the
query yourself now? If so, then yes, using the database's hashing
functions would work fine.