<div dir="ltr">Hi Ming-Ching Tiew,<br><br>What is the said kernel patch? Where can I get it?<br><br>Thanks,<br>-Bin<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Ming-Ching Tiew <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mingching.tiew@redtone.com">mingching.tiew@redtone.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
I tested the said kernel patch, some time ago. As far as I can remember,<br>
SNAT works but my tests might be flawed. Don't take my word for it.<br>
<br>
Cheers.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
Arun Srinivasan wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> Some clarification on tproxy4 usage:<br>
><br>
> I am using the following on kernel 2.6.25:<br>
><br>
> tproxy-kernel patch:<br>
> tproxy-kernel-2.6.25-20080519-165031-1211208631.tar.bz2<br>
><br>
> tproxy-iptables patch:<br>
> tproxy-iptables-1.4.0-20080521-113954-1211362794.patch<br>
><br>
> I followed all that is given in<br>
> <a href="http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/tproxy/README.txt" target="_blank">http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/tproxy/README.txt</a><br>
><br>
> The patches have got applied successfully and with Squid-3.HEAD, w00t,<br>
> I am able to see the full transparency functionality.<br>
><br>
> However, SNATting the traffic in NAT - POSTROUTING chain ends up in<br>
> vain. Is this the intended behavior or am I missing out anything?<br>
><br>
> TIA<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
tproxy mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tproxy@lists.balabit.hu">tproxy@lists.balabit.hu</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/tproxy" target="_blank">https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/tproxy</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Thanks,<br>-Bryan<br>
</div>